John Roberts issues 2025 Supreme Court report: What he says

Chief Justice John Roberts closed out 2025 with a message steeped in history and principle, invoking Thomas Paine’s Common Sense and the Declaration of Independence to underscore the enduring strength of America’s constitutional framework. In his annual report on the federal judiciary, Roberts described the Constitution and Declaration as “firm and unshaken,” borrowing a line from President Calvin Coolidge’s 1926 sesquicentennial address.

“True then; true now,” Roberts wrote.

The 13-page letter avoided direct mention of the political storms that have swirled around the courts this year, including clashes over immigration, tariffs, and executive power. Instead, Roberts focused on the judiciary’s role as a counter-majoritarian check, reminding readers that life tenure and salary protections were designed to ensure judicial independence.

Why It Matters

Roberts’ emphasis on constitutional stability comes after a year of intense scrutiny of the courts. Legal scholars and Democratic leaders warned of a potential constitutional crisis as President Donald Trump’s allies pushed back against rulings that slowed his conservative agenda.

The Trump administration faced setbacks in lower courts but logged roughly two dozen victories on the Supreme Court’s emergency docket. The court’s conservative majority has so far allowed PresiTrump to proceed with banning transgender people from military service, reclaiming billions in congressionally approved spending, pressing forward on immigration measures and removing Senate-confirmed leaders of independent agencies.

The justices also delivered a handful of defeats, including blocking Trump’s effort to deploy the National Guard to U.S. cities. In March, Roberts issued a rare public rebuke after Trump called for the impeachment of a federal judge who ruled against him in a deportation case involving Venezuelan migrants.

The annual report itself steers clear of those controversies, but its historical framing sends a signal: the judiciary’s legitimacy rests on principles that predate partisan battles.

John Roberts’ 2025 Judiciary Report: What to Know

Roberts’ report is primarily a historical essay, tracing the influence of Common Sense and the Declaration on the Constitution and highlighting how judicial independence was enshrined to prevent judges from being “dependent on [the King’s] Will alone.”

Roberts made only passing mention of current controversies. His letter opened with a look back at Common Sense and closed by quoting Calvin Coolidge’s call to “turn for solace” to the Constitution and Declaration of Independence “amid all the welter of partisan politics.”

He revisits the impeachment trial of Justice Samuel Chase in 1805, which cemented the principle that judges cannot be removed for unpopular decisions—a precedent Roberts calls vital to the separation of powers. The report also acknowledges that the ideals of liberty and equality articulated in 1776 remain aspirational, citing Lincoln, Susan B. Anthony, and Martin Luther King Jr. as figures who invoked those principles to advance civil rights.

He also called on judges to “continue to decide the cases before us according to our oath, doing equal right to the poor and to the rich, and performing all of our duties faithfully and impartially under the Constitution and laws of the United States.”

Beyond the historical narrative, Roberts includes caseload data: Supreme Court filings fell nine percent to 3,856 in the 2024 Term, while the Court heard 73 cases and issued 56 signed opinions. Federal appeals rose five percent, district court civil filings climbed four percent, and criminal defendant filings surged 13 percent, driven largely by immigration cases.

What Happens Next

The Supreme Court faces a consequential docket in 2026, with arguments looming over Trump’s bid to end birthright citizenship and his authority to impose sweeping tariffs. While Roberts’ letter avoids previewing those fights, it frames the judiciary’s mission in enduring terms: to uphold the rule of law “faithfully and impartially” amid political turbulence.

This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.